TYPOLOGY OF POACHERS IN BANGLADESH FROM SOCIAL
CONTEXT
Muttaki Bin Kamal1
1 University of
South Florida. Email: muttaki1019@gmail.com
|
|
ABSTRACT |
Keywords: Typology; Poaching; Bangladesh; Indigenous;
Crime;Wildlife; |
|
This paper poses a
critical discussion on the typology of Poachers in Bangladesh on the basis of
different social contexts and realities. It raises a question about the role
of Wildlife Act 2012 on conservation of wildlife and ensuring social justice
to the sects of the population who has a symbiotic lifestyle with the nature.
Also, the background of poaching in different areas, social, economic
condition and political affiliation of poachers of different type is discussed. Publisher All rights reserved. |
INTRODUCTION
Bangladesh is a
country with vast biodiversity with 6500 species of Flora and close to 7000
species of Fauna (Ahmed et el, 2008) known till date. Discovery of new species
happens every now and then. With such vast biodiversity and diverse landscapes
Bangladesh is a fruitful ground for scientific exploration. I am travelling
around the country for scientific and research explorations for a long time.
Sometimes self-funded and else with organizations like IUCN, Roehampton
University, WildTeam international etc for different research purpose. (This
vast viodiversity creats..)
Through the
explorations, I have come across different aspects of natural resource
exploitation and other crimes against nature. Poaching is one of these aspects.
There is a scarce amount of scientific data about the poachers in Bangladesh.
Samia Saif (2015) has done some detailed research about the Poachers in
Sundarban. From the explorations, I have come across many
different types of
Poachers in Bangladesh. Local population and experts notified me about some of
the types. The types of poachers vary in different regions of the country due
to the diversity of species, climate, culture and social context.
The Wild Life
Conservation and Security Act (2012) of Bangladesh tend to prohibit the
extraction of the wildlife and enforce penalties on extraction of them on the
basis of their endangered status. Bangladesh is a signatory in the United
Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) and eventually ratified it.
Bangladesh keeps her strong vocal in natural conservation worldwide by
including the issue as a fundamental principle of state policy in the constitution
(2011). On the light of such statutes Bangladesh repeals the older laws on
conservation and enacts new laws through Wildlife Act 2012. In such acts, legal
definitions of prohibited wild species for extraction, types of restricted
forest areas, punishment of killing or extraction of different species are
noted. A perpetrator of such prohibitions is legally punishable. But in many
cases social contexts of the perpetrators are different than the broader
aspect, for example, in the cases of indigenous people, local minority sects
etc. Though they practice a symbiotic extraction process that is harmonious
with nature, they fell under the laws. On the other hand, with different
loopholes in the laws, people with power commits crimes against environment, even
direct poaching for recreation, but slip the hand of justice.
CONSTITUTION, CONVENTIONS
ACTS AND PLANS
Article 18A of
Bangladesh Constitution (2011) lists the “endeavor” to protect the wildlife for
“future generations of citizens” as a fundamental principle to the state policy
of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh. Also, on article 23A, the protection of
unique culture and lifestyle of ethnic
groups, minorities
and sects is listed as a fundamental principle (2011). Article 18A obligates
the government of Bangladesh to act on conservation of wildlife.
Bangladesh is a
signatory in international conventions like Convention on Biological Diversity 1992
and its Cartagena Protocol, and the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species in Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Bangladesh is a prompt
actor in such conventions, for instance, joined CITES in 1981 and ratified it
in 1982 (Cites.org, 2015).
The Convention on
Biological Diversity was adopted in 1992, 22nd May in Nairobi (Cbd.int, 2015).
Bangladesh joined and ratified the Convention and its Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety (Cbd.int, 2015). The convention mandates the contracting parties of
this convention to develop national strategies, plans or programs for the
conservation of the biological diversity according to respective capability of
each contracting states in article 6A (Handbook, 2005). In article 8 of the
convention, the duties “as possible and as appropriate” for the contracting
parties for In-situ conservation is listed, where measures like restricted
areas, protected areas and zones etc are encouraged (pg-8). In section “j” of
article 8; as mentioned before in the preamble section of the convention; the
importance of indigenous knowledge and lifestyle in conservation and the
mandate to accommodate such knowledge and lifestyle in conservation endeavor in
legal way is stated.
In other articles,
provisions and sections of both the Convention itself and the Cartagena
Protocol (Secretariat, 2000), provisions and regulations on transport and
exchange on genetic samples, species, trophies etc of flora and fauna,
cooperation among the states in conservation, research, monitoring, dispute
settlement between parties etc are discussed.
CITES or
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species in Wild Fauna and Flora
focuses on the trade of different endangered species of world flora and fauna.
This convention lists around 35497 species and around 71 sub species of
endangered flora and fauna under three appendices of different importance
(Cites.org, 2015). The measures to be taken by the signatory parties about the
trades, listing and academic or conservation exchanges of the endangered
species are guided in this convention. Strict regulatory management is proposed
in the commercial exchange of the endangered species.
The Wildlife
Protection Act 2012 of Bangladesh maintains the guidance to form elaborate and
strict conservation act. While the conservations do not pose elaborate
definition of “poachers” or “perpetrators of conservation”, this act chalks these
details out from Bangladesh perspective. The Wildlife act (2012) defines
“hunting” as:
a) Killing,
capturing, poisoning of any wild animal or any attempt to do so; or b) Driving
any wildlife for the purpose of such actions
c) Injuring or
damaging and taking any part of the body of a wild animal or collecting or
destroying of nests or eggs of wild birds or reptiles.
This definition
encompasses the activities of poaching broadly and implies that the
perpetrators who fall under these definite actions are poachers.
Yet it differs
with the conventions in a significant point. The Convention on Biological
Diversity emphasized on the involvement and practice of indigenous knowledge
and lifestyle in conservation and thus the preservation of such knowledge and lifestyle
also. Though in section
32 of chapter 3 of
this act, the indigenous people are granted indemnity for their traditional
trophies etc
derived from wildlife (declared as collected prior to the enactment of this
law), and in section 21 it is said to involve the indigenous people and their
knowledge in co-management system; the act affect the indigenous people,
minority sects of the population and their traditional lifestyle which is
symbiotic with nature and conservation.
Also, provisions
of licenses, grant of permit for different purposes, ecotourism, provision for
registered trade etc create opportunity loopholes in the law for different
types of poaching.
Most
significantly, such permits are easily available for the people from higher
strata of the society. With their influence, they have the chance to skip the
provisions of this law on exploiting the limits of the permits (article 25).
On the other hand,
different types of marginal and poverty ridden people often dwell near the
sanctuaries and protected areas. The sanctuaries are often situated in the
indigenous territory also. With just the provisions of this law, without the
symbiotic management of nature and human activities, both the nature and
wildlife are threatened and the dwellers face injustice.
CONCEPT MAPPING FOR THE SOCIAL
CONTEXT OF POACHERS
In order for the
classification of poachers in Bangladesh from social context, I used three
basic questions about the population who are involved in such extraction of
natural resources. These questions are:
1. What is the
poachers’ economic condition?
This question
encompasses the economic condition of the people who are involved in direct
hunting and extraction as well as the people who influence the direct act. I
examined if the grass root poachers are poor and village dwellers, if they do
poaching to earn their bread and butter. I
also observed the
poachers who are economically well off and engage or influence direct poaching
for recreation and profit. The economic influence on the poachers is also examined,
for instance the influence and involvement of the tourists in direct poaching
is examined.
2. How is the
poachers’ social situation?
This question is
asked to measure the social position that poachers hold, if they have the
ability to avoid the punishment or not and if they acquire the permits required
to regulated extraction of resources. Also, the ethnicity distribution among
the poachers is also covered by this question. This question also involves the
aspects of social background from which the poachers come from. The community
they belong to- mainstream population, minority sects or indigenous citizens-
is an important question to ask, because different communities have different
point of view on natural resource extraction. While the mainstream population
opts for profit maximization and economic expansion and puts life standard on
the level of consumption, the minority sects like “Bede” or “Snake Charmers”
depends on it as a necessity for survival. Indigenous sects take themselves as
“children of nature”, vastly pagan and depend on symbiotic coexistence with
nature. They are going through different changes due to modernization and
communication with the mainstream population. The aspects of such change are
also covered under this question.
3. Do poachers
have political affiliation?
Political
affiliation is plays an important role in many crimes. So is the case with
poaching. This question is about the influence of political affiliation of the
poachers. The pressure from local political leadership drives poor people to
poaching. For instance in 2015, six suspected tiger poachers were shot dead
(The Daily Star, 2015) in Sundarban. The local people told me that it
was done by the
administration to hide some influential names of local politics that were
involved in poaching. Also political influence poses some assurances to the
affiliated poachers of protection from punishment. But the poachers with no
affiliation with politics and extractors from indigenous population and other
minority sects generally do not enjoy the backup of political affiliation. So,
they are commonly convicted.
I stratified the
poachers on the basis of how many of these three criteria work positively for
each of the type. There are some other sub-types under the major types of
poachers I found throughout the country.
TYPOLOGY BASED ON THE SOCIAL
CONTEXT
The different
types of poachers on the basis of social-economic context, methods, motifs etc
are entwined and it is a difficult task to separate and generalize a type. Yet
there are patterns in different poaching practices and poachers. Using the
questions on the social context of the poachers the typology of them spreads as
four major types with nine sub types and branches. They are as follows:
1. Mainstream
“Plain land” Poachers: The mainstream population of Bangladesh or ethnically
“Bengalis” is also called as the “people from plain land”. As the majority of
the citizens of Bangladesh they contain the largest type of poachers from
socio-economic background. The plain land people are distributed all over the
country. As Bangladesh contains a high amount of cultivable fertile land,
(around 52% of the area), agriculture is the largest economy. To define the
mainstream “plain land” poachers, I will exclude the urban population as they
consist in a different type of poaching. The root level direct poaching is
mostly conducted by the rural people and in most of the cases, poaching is
not the only means
of living for these poachers. Economic profits, lure of unconventional bounty,
influence of gaining profit, pressure from influential people and visitors,
whims etc work behind the motivation of these poachers. Also they come to
poaching from all the major religions and philosophies (Ghosh, 2015). Their
targets and methods differ according to their religion sometimes. For instance,
Muslim poachers usually do not kill “wild boar” or “tortoises” as eating them
is prohibited in Islam. The plain land indigenous people and minority sects are
also mostly excluded from this type as they consist in another type. Yet it is
entwined, the identity and background of these poachers as sometimes poachers
from other type act from same motif.
Also, many
mainstream people or “plain land” people dwell in the hilly areas of the
country among the indigenous people. The mainstream poachers are found in all
the terrains of Bangladesh.
These poachers
range in 6 subtypes.
Professional
Poachers: Professional poachers take poaching as their income source. It is not
that
they solely depend
on poaching for living or they do not know to do else, rather, they chose to
earn from poaching because it is more profitable than the regular occupations
in different circumstances. Some of them keep another source of income besides
poaching, and then poaching becomes secondary source for them. On the basis of
such practice, they are divided into two branches.
Primary
professional poachers: Those for whom poaching is the primary
source of income, they are included in this category. They usually dwell in the
nearby villages of the jungles where they take on poaching operations. They are
members of village community so it is easy for them to
disguise and hide
among them. As poaching is their profession, they know about the foreign and
national level buyers of their games. For example, in the Sundarban region,
they often use the Pashur and other river channels where vessels from different
countries come to supply these games to the vessels. It is not much that they
always profit from such bargains. Their earnings depend on the circumstances
and their ability to bargain.
The distribution
of these poachers is different throughout the country. Sundarban is home to
many exotic wildlife; both flora and fauna; and a paramount attraction to the
customers. It is situated by the sea and it holds the coastline. Sundarban also
shares border with India and it is divided between Bangladesh and India. So it
is much easier to trade wild specimen from Sundarban.
On the other hand,
the next most densely diverse flora and fauna are found in the Sylhet-
Chittagong belt. It also shares border with India. But the border there is a
sensitive one as adjacent to it, lays the Seven Sisters- distant and turmoil
provinces of India. So the border guarding is heavy and coerce there. Moreover,
as the Sundarban is situated near to a major port and city of India; from the
West Bengal province; the trades are easier there. But the Sylhet Chittagong
belt does not have such a marketing hub nearby. The local sea and border land
docks in this belt is a way to smuggle some of the wild specimen in and out.
The advantage in transportation in Chittagong creates another subtype of
poaching.
In the middle and
northwestern part of Bangladesh, the wildlife situation is very poor to create
any poaching opportunities for the professional poachers. The madhupur- bhawal
forest is home to some wild life that comes under the threat of poaching.
The coastal belt
of the country sees the wildlife and marine diversity in the coastal
plantations in these areas. Deer, tortoise, crabs etc are the subject of
poaching here. Including professional poaching, other different types are
present here. As there is no land predator in the island bases for Deer, such
as in “Nijhum Dwip”, a common technique of neutralization for the poachers and
people to hunt there is that, with the immense rate of growing, the Deer
population has to be controlled, otherwise they will be threatened.
The migratory
birds are also victims of professional poaching. Before the enforcement of
environmental and conservation laws and acts, the migratory birds were caught
in numbers and openly sold even in the capital. With the gradual increase in
the operations of Wildlife Crime Control Unit and other conservation bodies
along with the increase in consciousness among the people, the threat to the
migratory birds is decreasing. Yet, poaching of such birds is not completely
checked.
Samia Saif (2015)
stated about the trappers in Sundarban in her category of poachers in
Sundarban. Trappers are found in different areas of Bangladesh. Their method of
poisoning (Bish Faad), Chitka or contracting snare, Haata Faad or hanging snare
is commonly used also. There are other methods to catch different animals like
Bears, snakes etc. Saif categorized the trappers differently from the
professional poachers mostly on the basis of tiger hunting. Though it is
commonly seen among any of the hunters, trapping is a special technique for
professional poachers. With traps, they do not have to be present while
catching a game, do not have to carry gun and avoid many obstacles.
Secondary
professional poachers: Secondary professional poachers are the
people who take poaching as the secondary source of income. Primarily they have
both legal and illegal means to
earn. Common legal
first profession for them are tourist guide, fishermen etc while the illegal
means are wood thievery from the forest, pirates, drug dealing etc. They are
not even occasional poachers. Their prey is usually bovine, deer and other
edible sets of wildlife.
Secondary poachers
with legal first profession are available all around the country. Local
farmers, labor, fishermen, village heads are often involved in deforestation,
animal hunting etc for economic profit. Acquisition against officers of forest
department of the republic is also common throughout the country of patronizing
poachers and in deforestation. In June 2012, the then chief of wildlife section
of the forest department, Tapan Kumar Dey was alleged by an arrested tiger cub
trafficker (The Daily Star, 2012) to place the order for the cubs. The arrested
person also indicated about other order placements on behalf of Mr. Dey
demanding Crocodiles, Python, Gharials etc before. Mr. Dey handled the purchase
of animals for the “Bangabandhu Safari Park” in Gazipur.
Secondary poachers
with illegal first profession consist of pirates in Sundarban, robbers and
other miscreants hiding in different forests of the country etc. Pirates of the
Sundarban usually hunt Tigers for safety as they hide in the jungle to avoid
law enforcers (Saif, 2015). It is true for other types of robbers who dwell in
the other forests. For the pirates of the Sundarban, poaching brings extra
income also. They are well connected with the buyers. Even the professional
poachers keep in touch with them to connect with buyers.
For such poachers
dwelling in other forests of the country, usually the local market is the place
to sell. How much connection do they have with the foreign buyers is still
unknown.
No academic
research is conducted to identify the buyers of these professional poachers. So
this area is still ambiguous. The direct poachers are encountered, they make
the newspaper heading
sometimes, but
their buyers lurk in shadow. These buyers do not take liability of the
professional poachers. The shootout of October 2015 in Sundarban reported by
newspapers (Daily Star) indicates so. Also from such an incident, it can be
sensed that the buyers and middlemen of such trades are powerful people, so
indicated the local people. So they stay out of focus and the poachers; being
from underprivileged strata of the society are punished; sometimes in such
severe manner. The government is planning to take more rigorous action against
475 “listed” professional poachers in Sundarban according to the news reports
(the independent, 2015). But the people of influence in the background are
still not touched.
Seasonal Poachers:
Seasonal poachers hunt animals in a season, not throughout the year. Winter
is a fertile
season for poaching as the odds like rain, fear of snake, obstacles in movement
due to flooding of low lands etc lower in winter. In winter come the migratory
birds and other environmental attributes give advantage to the poachers. Winter
is also the largest tourist season. There are other tourist seasons as the pre
settled vacations. In such seasons poaching activities increase at a high rate.
The independent reports (2015) about such a season during Eid where they claim
about 100 groups of poachers enter Sundarban for deer and other hunting.
Different types of poachers enter in different jungles in seasons, keeping a
track of all of them is a difficult job even for the forest department. The
seasonal poachers also join them.
These poachers
come from both nearby villages and different areas. Their primary profession
varies. Boatman, tour guides are often requested by the tourists to entertain
them with deer meat. In 2012, I went to a tour in Sundarban with the Department
of University of Dhaka I studied my Honors in. There few of my classmates
started collecting money from other to arrange deer meat for dinner. I they
were able to collect the money then, they would have given it to the people
from the tour operators who were accompanying us to procure the meat.
Seasonal poaching
is pursued by many as a seasonal opportunity of high profiting business.
Such poachers are
hard to detect or track, so usually they escape from the law enforcement. But
they usually do not hold the capability to escape conviction if caught. Larger
tour operators with strong connection and hold can manage to manage such poaching
incidents more silently and escaping the law.
Occasional
poachers: Occasional poachers just use their opportunity of encounter with wild
animals,
occasional need or order for animals to hunt animals. Occasional poachers often
kill animal just out of curiosity. In Sylhet, Gazipur, Comilla, Lakshmipur and
other parts of the country I talked with people who have done occasional
poaching. Many of them told me they sometimes killed different birds unknown to
them and later found out that the bird is not edible or the meat is not tasty.
Also in areas nearby forests, people kill animals to treat the guests in with
some delicacy of deer or bird meat.
Another occasional
poaching occurs when workers who work inside of the forests come across wild
animals sometimes. Not on all occasion, but in 10-15 in a 100, they try to hunt
or capture the wild animals.
Occasional
poachers do poaching for diverse motif. Sudden need of safety in the jungle,
curiosity, sudden rush of opportunity, courting personal and local guests with
honor, religious occasion etc work behind their motif of poaching. Most of the
cases; when they capture a specimen or trophy of a wild animal; they do not
even know where to sell it.
Religious occasion
is an important cause of occasional poaching. For example, Hindus eat Indian
Porcupine (Hystrix Indica) during the worship office of the goddess
Kali. Also tortoise is eaten by them in different occasion.
Due to the
restriction about keeping specimen, trophies etc in Wildlife Act 2012, many
occasional poachers are caught. But the generalized punishment treats them as
the same with other poachers. Though such strong approach of the act decreased
the rate of occasional poaching, punitive system fails to address the root of
the practice. Now, those who occasionally kill or capture wildlife try to avoid
punishment and law by hiding evidence, but the killing and capturing continues,
though at a decreased rate. Consciousness building and educating people about
conservation would work better in preventing the occasional poachers. Already
with the growing national and international level concern about conservation
and vast activities throughout the country decreased the tendency of occasional
poaching in general people.
Whims Poaching: In
1980’s a whims spread about Toad export in Bangladesh that one can earn
huge money by
selling Toads they are exported to countries like Singapore, Thailand etc. Mass
capture of Toads in that decade and after endangered the existence of Toads in
Bangladesh. Later, another whims spread out about the Tokay Gecko that buyers
are paying over a 100000 in Bangladeshi currency for each of them. I saw a
Gecko captured in the Academy of Fine Arts in the capital. On the spot people
raised its probable price higher than three hundred thousand in discussion. But
there was no one who was paying the money or knows about a buyer.
Common people get
involved in mass poaching during such whims for easy bounty of profit. But they
do not have any idea about the credibility of the whims, information about the
price or buyers. So most of the cases the animals are killed or captured only.
There is no
academic work on such whims poaching. But often the events of such poaching are
found. I met a Bengali guide in Bandarban, Kabir, who told me that he caught a
Gecko and put it in care of an indigenous villager for growing it. After three
years he will collect the Gecko. In
answer to my
question about the buyer and payment, he told me that he captured the Gecko
after he received the down payment. The final payment, according to him is
going to be three hundred thousand of Bangladeshi currency. He did not reveal
the identity of the buyer, middleman or the villager. The purpose of Gecko is
unknown to him.
Suman, a youth
from Koroitola village of Noakhali mentioned of three whims in that village
while I was interviewing him. Firstly, he talked about the whims about
“pillars” where people went crazy to find out an unknown metal object in the
village planted by the British in the colonial rule. They heard that such “pillars”
are worth millions. But they do not have any factual data about neither the
existence nor whereabouts of the pillars nor their price.
The whim about the
“pillars” is similar by unknown origin, lure of bounty and fictional stories
about it with the poaching whims. Suman also mentioned about two recent whims
of Toad poaching and Gecko poaching. He said most of the village teenagers and
children left now rock unturned to find Toads for selling. But no one of them
sold a piece as they did not know any buyer.
Suman told that in
last year a party of seekers came to the village from the town to search for
Geckos. He does not know from which city the party came from or any detailed
identity of the party. But he told me that an elder of the village called
“Karim” found inspired the villagers to find Geckos as he was working as a
liaison for the party. They were promised to be paid with ten million in
Bangladeshi currency if they can find a Gecko of 350 grams. Two young men from
the village found a Gecko but the Gecko weighed only 250 grams and they did not
get the bounty. They were offered 30000 taka by another party for that Gecko.
I interviewed
Karim later on. He told me about another party from the city whom he fetched
two Large Indian Civets from the village for 7500 taka. He did not disclose the
identity of the parties to me. But his approach expressed he knew about their
identities.
The trace of the
origin of these whims, the buyers, prices, middleman etc about such poaching
needs revealing. Academic work on such poaching is necessary for conservation
and tracing such poaching as it is a devastating practice for the wildlife.
Trade Extractors:
Different type of
wildlife trade in both the internal and external markets in Bangladesh is seen.
Traditional medicine, delicacy food in foreign countries, etc are the prominent
trades that are going on from long past here. The extraction of wildlife for
these trades is high and unmeasured. Specimens are sold openly even in the
capital for virility, cure etc.
For example, in
Nilkhet in the capital lizards are sold as medicine for virility. It is called
“shanda” in the local language. When talked about it with the seller, he said
he imported this lizard from India. There were small scorpions and leeches too.
Trade extractors capture
both listed and non-listed species of wild animals. As the capture is for trade
purpose and they handle the business, over extraction and wastage are common. I
found few small fishing corporations who are directly involved in Shark
poaching. They use small anchors to catch Sharks. Even gigantic Bull Sharks are
captured by these corporations.
They export Sharks
illegally to Myanmar as Shark trade and capture is banned in there. In the list
of protected wild species in Wildlife act 2012 of Bangladesh, Bull Shark is not
listed (Alam,
2013). Yet the
mass of extraction by these corporations is over thousands of tons every year.
The
set of shark fins
and tail, shark teeth, skin, meat all parts of sharks are exported to foreign
buyers as there is very small demand in local market for sharks.
There is not
monitoring or measurement from government at all on such trade extractions. If
the extraction so continues, many shark species should become critically
endangered soon.
Moreover, there
are docks in the Cox’s Bazaar and Teknaf region; the same region of the shark
trading corporations; which are not listed by government. In these docks, enormous
amount of fishes and marine species are captured and processed. Wastage of
marine species is high in these docks too. Here, both protected, non-protected
by law marine species are found in numbers.
Interviewing the
monitoring officer of the docks in the region in 2014, I learned that
monitoring is only done in the government dock. The other non-listed docks are
out of monitoring. The officer does not know about the shark trade. Government
procedure lists the marine species as “fishes” and there is only four
categories of fishes according to it. Hilsha, Rup Chanda, Chanda and
Miscellaneous are the four categories and except for first three fish species,
the other entire marine specimens are listed under “Miscellaneous”.
These trade
extractors in Cox’s Bazar are economically solvent, socially powerful and often
politically affiliated people. They have their own organization called “Hangor
Malik Kollyan Samiti” (Shark Traders Association). They have their own boats
and workforce to capture shark.
In the dock all
sorts of fishermen dump their captures for processing and sell. It is hard to
keep the track of them.
A big network of
business is expanded behind the Trade Extractors. A lot of them are
economically solvent and socio-politically powerful. The traders of local
medicines are from
lower strata of
the society. Mere prohibition is not enough to control such extraction.
Awareness building, alternative opportunity building for the traders and strict
monitoring is needed simultaneously. If the law is bent by the powerful
traders, then there will be a monopoly for them as the poorer fishermen would
not be able to avoid the law. But the long these trades will keep the more
species will be endangered.
Community
Poachers: Different villages, village communities act in killing and capturing
of
wildlife for
different motifs. Sometimes for safety as per in border regions of Sylhet,
Sherpur etc where wild elephant, bear, leopards attack. Also it was a common
scenario in Sundarban before Wild Team started awareness program and village
tiger response team operation there. Many tigers were killed by the mob in
Sundarbans. Saif (2015) reports that villagers in Sundarban beat tigers to
death sometime in order to collect tiger parts for economic and medicinal
purpose also. But in other regions where the villagers are not familiar with
such wildlife trade, animal killing for such purpose by the mob is rare. In
those regions, mob beats animals to death usually for safety and from anger if
the animal acts in a harm’s way.
Communities and
individuals from villages act in killing animals both for pest killing and
killing without direct reason. There was a Face Book post in 2015 where a
person posted his kill, a monitor that was eating fish from his farm. I visited
Koroitola village in Lakshmipur on 1st of January 2016, just four days prior to
my visit, two Large Indian Civets (Viverra Zibethi) were killed in that
village by poisoning because they were eating fowls from households.
Yusuf, a village
elder told me that in the monsoon, a shopkeeper killed a non-venomous water
snake which was just resting behind his shop. On the next day its pair was also
killed by the same shopkeeper at the same place, while it was mating with the
dead one according to Yusuf.
To answer my
question, he said the shopkeeper knew the snakes were non venomous but he
killed them anyway. It is not that he was afraid of them Yusuf told me that
snakes are usually killed because they eat fish from the ponds. I observed a
contempt approach towards snakes among the village people due to some mixed
reason. In many religions snake is coined as a “negative character”. Also a
mental repellency occurs to snakes in them because it creeps. Often it is
observed that snakes are killed from such mixed conscience.
Another village
elder is “Karim” whom I mentioned in the whims poaching section. He is mostly a
labor. He does different things to earn, wood chopping mostly. Other villagers
told me that he knows about the wildlife of the village as he roams day and
night in the village Holts. His approach expressed that he is familiar with
animal trading. He mentioned his strong bargaining with the party which came to
buy the Large Indian Civets.
In the Wild Life
act 2012, there is provision to convict organizations for poaching and harm
towards wildlife, but such communities are not mentioned or there is no
provision for convicting. This is positive because detection of leaders of the
community in such actions is difficult as most of the people even children
participate in collecting body parts and beating of the animal. Also awareness
and precaution rather than punishment is effective in this context. Success of
Wild Team Bangladesh in decreasing tiger killing in Sundarban is a proof of it.
There is another
trend in the village communities dwelling around the forests. They
intentionally set fire in the forest to clear out land and turn the forest
lands into crop fields or households. Due to such forest fire a lot of species
from both flora and fauna are damaged. It is really hard to find out the person
who started the fire, even if the fire is intentional or unintentional. The
forest act
hold provisions to
treat such actions but the difficulty to trace the perpetrator stands as a huge
obstacle. For instance, Sundarban caught such a fire in 2010 (bdnews24.com,
2010).
Killing and
capturing different animals is often a pastime for the villagers. It is a
common approach of village people in Bangladesh that wild animals are usually
pests. Thus they kill such animals without thinking. Village youth and children
often chase, torment different animals for recreation. Many village dwellers
take killing animals as a pride and advertise their kill.
But such situation
is changing slowly with the advent of modern technologies, migration to cities
and abroad by the villagers and creation of newer scopes for recreation for
them. Formal education does little about awareness building of village people
about wildlife. But education and awareness building for them will work more
effectively than the law for conservation.
2. Recreational
Poachers: Many hunters, shooters are present in Bangladesh who often forms
groups to go on hunting for fun. From the British period, hunting is considered
as a royal pass time. Such groups of hunter consists officials of armed forces,
multinational companies, government officials etc. For the presence of high
profile individuals, these groups are overlooked by the law enforcers and skip
the hand of law. They usually operate in winter and hunt migratory birds. Yet I
came to know about a groups operation where they killed around 700 migratory
birds and 7 deer in a southern island at the Bay of Bengal. They bribed some
higher officials with their hunt to avoid legal consequences. One of the
members of that group told me that there are zone based groups in different
regions of Bangladesh. They operated in their designated zone, sometimes one or
two hunters from one zone is invited to hunt in other zone. He told me, the
group in Chittagong hill tracts region dream of killing a Black Panther some
day.
Tanneries receive
skins of tiger, leopard, and snakes for tanning from high post individuals who
keep such trophies of their game. They hunt for recreation and with their socio
economic position, they can easily acquire permit under the Wildlife Act 2012.
Though there is provision in the act of punishment for exploiting the permit,
such people of power can easily skip the hand of law much efficiently than the
other types of poachers. Of all the poachers, they are mentioned the least. As
such gaming is seen as a royal gesture and right of the rich.
Armed forces
officers in the hill tracts often acquire wild animals in their possession.
There are mini zoos inside of the cantonments sometimes. Tough the trends
changed from the past, I learned about a bear named “bullet” of the Chittagong
Zoo. He was donated to the zoo by an army official. The official found him
before naming him “bullet” from a Major as a gift. The major caught the bear
from the jungles of Ruma, Bandarban. It is an incident of the 1980’s. Trends
changed, yet with power even endangered species can be acquired by the higher
society individuals. They can also import such species using loopholes in CITES
provisions and regulations.
3. Minority
Poachers: There are many minority and different ethnic groups in Bangladesh.
Some of them are
indigenous people and others are minority sects by religion, culture or
profession. These marginalized minority citizens of the country are mostly
dependent on the nature of the land from long past. Naturally, they built a
symbiotic lifestyle with the nature with minimal extraction of the needed
resources.
Yet, under the
definition of “hunting” in the Wildlife act 2012, they indiscriminately fall
under the punitive provisions for the “poachers”. Though some opportunity is
given to them to keep their traditional trophies derived from wild specimen
from the past and a provision on
community
management of wildlife is kept, following the Wildlife act strictly leaves
little chance of practicing their traditional symbiotic lifestyle with nature
and using their knowledge about conservation. Ironically; as stated before;
Article 23A of the Constitution lists protection of their traditional lifestyle
and culture as a fundamental principle of the republic.
It is an injustice
to them to coin them as “poachers” indiscriminately. I am using the term to
point the legal definition.
The minority
poachers are of two sub types:
Indigenous
Poachers: There is doubt about the population,
number of groups of indigenous people in Bangladesh. Different sources provide
with different statistics (Ebbd.info, 2015). From
35 to 45 smaller
groups, from 1.3 percent to 2 percent of the total population etc statistics
are provided by the government and other organizations (Drong & Moy Dhamai,
2015).
The indigenous
people of Bangladesh are spread over all the regions in the country. They live
in small communities in these regions. They most densely live in the Hill
Tracts region. Among other areas, they live in Chittagong, Sylhet, Rajshashi,
Khulna, Barishal and Tangail areas of the particularly.
In general they
are dependent on the nature for their livelihood from ancient time. Situation
is changing in the modern days. Because of their dependency, they tend to
extract minimal from the nature. In the past, they used to store very minimal
due to the lack of storage facilities. Also the lack of communication prevented
them from trade of natural resources. Such obstacles and dependency on nature
influenced them to improvise symbiotic lifestyle and tradition with the nature.
For example,
different tribes of an indigenous group often have different totem; derived
from fruits, birds or animals; eating or harming such symbolic lives is a sin
for them (Sattar, 2012). In this way the extraction of species from the wild is
kept to minimal though most of the tribes are omnivorous. Also, they are aware
if they exhaust all these natural resources, there is be none left for the
future.
Modernization
brought different changes in their lives. Firstly, due to communication and
modern education, they are becoming less dependent on the nature through
farming, cultivation etc. In the long year of mingling with the indigenous
people in different areas of Bangladesh, I learned that now they hunt for food
scatteredly as they have cattle and fowls in their homes. Some domestication of
wildlife like different wild bovines are already done to the extent because
some of them are no longer found in the wild in Bangladesh. I have seen
specimen of hunted animals in different villages of indigenous people in
Bandarban. In the plain land indigenous people, the trend of hunting and
keeping trophies is at the most decline. Santals of Rajshahi and Khagrachori
has some of hunting practice.
The hunting for
food I observed in the “Boolum Village” in Bandarban. It is a village of the
Murung people. One morning they caught a pair of Rhesus Monkeys in 2014. Monkey
meat is a favorite food of the Murung. I talked with them about the act and
punishment but they had no idea of the act.
The decrease of
wild species due to the hunting of the indigenous people is not measured. With
almost one hundredth of population dwelling in the region, their hunting
mustn’t have done much damage.
What is more
concerning is that the pressure and influence of the urban people and
modernization. Due to the development of communication and transport, a
numerous number of tourists visit the hill tracts every year they often caprice
for exotic delicacy as the meat of python, deer, monitor or pangolin. They offer
handsome amount of money and other expensive stuff to the indigenous people in
exchange of such delicacies. In one occasion, I saw a tourist group to send an
indigenous man to hunt a barking deer for dinner. The man hunted down one with
his gun.
For such
influences and modern idea of consumerism, the indigenous people try to expand
such profitable business. For example, there are some restaurants in the hill
tracts which commercially sell meats of deer, pangolin, python and monitor.
Tourists rush there to eat such delicacies.
While treated by
the law, the indigenous people are questioned for poaching. The tourists and
the influencers are usually spared. As a result, in spite of punishing some of
the indigenous people, the hunt does not stop.
Minority Sects:
There are many of the minority sects in Bangladesh who depend on the nature.
Some depend on
nature because of the local culture, some for religious belief and some for
professional cause. “Bede” or the snake charmers, “Bawali” or the leaf
gatherer, “Mouali” or the honey gatherer etc are some of these sects. They are
expert in many skills needed for conservation. For instance, the snake charmers
know snake handling and capturing and are often called by the people to remove
poisonous snakes from their houses. The leaf and honey gatherers know about the
jungles way.
But there is no
definitive provision for such minority sects in the Wildlife act. Rather the
generalized provisions endanger their livelihood especially for the snake
charmers as they depend on snake catching and handling.
4. Political
Poachers:
Politically
influenced poaching is a critical threat in the sector of Conservation in
Bangladesh. The motif of political poaching is usually the possession of lands
and it is usually done towards the flora of different areas. The fauna is hit
by habitat loss, forest fires, and occasional encounter killings by the wood
choppers etc due to this practice. Tops of local political power such as
Chairman of different unions, local heads of different political parties etc
act as the influence or instigator while marginal poor people act directly in
such poaching.
The intentional
forest fires in Sundarban mentioned in the community poaching section is often
politically influenced. By starting forest fires, they start the deforestation
process. As the monitoring of the burnt area afterwards is weak from the
government, they keep claiming the land gradually and at last the land of the
jungle becomes part of their estate.
There was a long
plantation belt along the coastline of Noakhali in the 1990’s. The social
plantation project of the government established this belt as a shield from
cyclones. The flora and fauna flourished in this coastline plantation belt.
Nurul Amin Bhuyian was a forest guard here. He described how the forest was
destroyed by political influence. He said political leaders keep from direct
action themselves and deploy stranded and desperate people. These people are
poor and marginal. They chop down trees, start forest fires and instigate
people to work for deforestation. Often women are deployed to chop down trees.
The forest guards do not detain
women usually, so
it becomes hard for them to stop them. These perpetrators become violent when
challenged. Forest guards face violence from them
Such process is
destroying forest all over Bangladesh. Nurul Amin emphasized on the Forest of
Nijhum Island, that the scenic beauty of nature is declining and it is under a
threat for such activities.
The political
leaders leave no trace of them in poaching. The personnel they use as help are
prosecuted instead as they are involved in direct poaching. Thus this process
continues. Nurul Amin also emphasized that the political leaders can easily
stop such activities as they start them. So, while enforcement is failing in
this matter, motivating political leaders in conservation can work effectively.
THE NECESSARY STEPS AND INJUSTICE:
CONCLUSIVE REMARKS
Conservation is
easy said than done. Especially in the context of Bangladesh, it is harder to
protect the wildlife. The society of Bangladesh has endured colonial exploitation,
where the rulers were concerned of maximum profit from natural resources. The
native society in the colonial period and later had human conditions to think
about, poverty, development, market expansion etc. It pursued capitalism to
attend to the human needs of fundamental and human rights, which were vastly
denied in the colonial period. So, society found less time to attend to the
environment and biodiversity. Now, in the verge of catastrophes due to climate
change, voices are rising for conservation. Government is taking action by
passing different laws to protect environment and biodiversity.
But where the
society’s concern is centered on human development and it is still facing
severe impediments in that sector, mere laws and punishment could not do any
better. People of
Bangladesh now
hardly realize the importance of biodiversity and the grim of ecological
balance destruction. Especially among the urban people educated in capitalist
practices and philosophies, the tendency for utmost exploitation of natural
resources in every way possible is deeply rooted. On the other hand, rural
marginal people, less educated in modern capitalist education, have the sense
of harmony with nature due to the traditional nature oriented practices.
Punitive laws enacted
discriminately will achieve very less if such a difference and drift from
native tradition persevere. Especially when different national and
international powerful syndicates are trading with wildlife secretly, only the
powerless will face the punishment and the core dealers will be spared. The
silent national, international and political syndicates are the “ghost buyers”
of wildlife like Gecko, Civet, Tiger parts etc. Government overlooks them as
either scratch other’s back. As seen in the discussion, poaching by the local
rural people are unorganized, they usually do not know where to sell the
wildlife. On the other hand, the “ghost buyers” are so organized that they are
always active yet unseen.
In such a
situation, the most effective way for conservation is through the participation
of the people. Rather drifting away from the tradition, practicing the nature
oriented, simple lifestyle is needed now. Consciousness building, research on
traditional environment friendly lifestyle and technology, engaging the people
in the grass root level will work much more effectively for conservation. The
indigenous knowledge, culture and practice of all the ethnic people of the
country provide salient guidance towards natural conservation.
A paramount
example of how effectively the participation of local people and practice of
traditional knowledge can work on conservation is set by Mr. Mollah Rejaul
Karim; former Divisional Forest Officer of Rangpur and Rajshahi division. With
very less amount of funding and logistic support from his department, he
started a conservation revolution in Bangladesh. In every district of the
divisions he once served, he built voluntary groups of rural people who
actively participate in conservation. He preached his initiatives through
social media Facebook and by that more urban youth is joining in conservation.
In his telephone interview with me taken on 4th of January 2016, he described
the vast number of wildlife he rescued and number of air guns and other weapons
of poaching he ceased with the help of the local community.
Such is the
effectiveness of popular concern. Also, only playing by law will hamper the
lifestyle of different indigenous, ethnic and marginal groups of the country,
that are more nature friendly than the mainstream capitalism inclined one. If
only the laws are played, the indigenous knowledge and practice of symbiotic
lifestyle with the nature will be omitted. Research, realization and practice
of such lifestyle is more urgently needed for sustainability.
The root of the
people of people of Bangladesh lies among the native and indigenous tradition
and culture. This root is the guidance for sustainable development through
conservation as it is the symbiosis between the people and the nature of this
land.
REFERENCES
Ahmed, Zia Uddin; Begum, ZN Tahmida;
Hassan, M Abul; Khondoker, Monriuzzaman; Kabir, Syed M Humayun; Ahmad, Monowar;
Ahmed, Abu Tweb Abu; Rahman, AK Ataur; Haque, Enam Ul, (edit.) (2008). In: Encyclopedia
of Flora and Fauna of Bangladesh, 1st ed. Vol: 1. Dhaka: Asiatic Society of
Bangladesh.
Alam, A. (2013). Bon, Matsya o Pashu
Bishoyok Ain (pp. 206-208). Dhaka: Bangladesh Law
Book Academy.
bdnews24.com,. (2010). Forest, fire
officials battle Sundarban blaze. Retrieved 29 December
2015, from http://bdnews24.com/bangladesh/2010/03/21/forest-fire-officials-battle-
sundarban-blaze1
Cites.org, (2015). List of Contracting
Parties | CITES. [Online] Available at:
https://www.cites.org/eng/disc/parties/chronolo.php
[Accessed 22 Dec. 2015].
Cites.org,. (2015). The CITES species |
CITES. Retrieved 27 December 2015, from
https://www.cites.org/eng/disc/species.php
Cbd.int, (2015). History of the
Convention. Retrieved 27 December 2015, from https://www.cbd.int/history/
Cbd.int,. (2015). Country Profiles.
Retrieved 27 December 2015, from https://www.cbd.int/countries/?country=bd
Drong, S., & Moy Dhamai, B. (2015). Update
2011 - Bangladesh. Iwgia.org. Retrieved 29
December 2015, from
http://www.iwgia.org/regions/asia/bangladesh/43-eng-
regions/asia/847-update-2011-bangladesh
The Daily Star,. (2015).
"Gunfight" with cops- six suspected tiger poachers shot dead in
Bangladesh. Retrieved from
http://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/6-poachers-shot- dead-sundarbans-124558
The Daily Star,. (2012). 3 tiger cubs
rescued Poacher brought them from Sundarbans to Dhaka; claims top forest boss
placed order, p. Front Page. Retrieved from
http://archive.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=237987
Ebbd.info,. (2015). Indigenous
Communities of Bangladesh. Retrieved 29 December 2015, from
http://www.ebbd.info/indigenous-communities.html
Fundamental Principles of State Policy.
(2011). In Constitution of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh (p. 6).
Dhaka: Ministry of Law, Jurisdiction and Parliamentary Affairs. Bangladesh.
Ghosh, A. (2015). Experience about
poaching. Via Skype.
Handbook of the Convention on Biological
Diversity: Including its Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (3rd ed.). (2005).
Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Pg-7
The independent,. (2015). Forest deptt
detects 475 ‘poachers’ in Sundarbans. Retrieved from
http://www.theindependentbd.com/printversion/details/20190
The Independent Bangladesh,. (2015). Poaching
increases during Eid in Sundarbans.
Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KlnCsSfPgs
List of Parties (in United Nations
Convention of Biological Diversity). (n.d.). Retrieved
December 7, 2015, from
https://www.cbd.int/information/parties.shtml
Saif, S. and MacMillan, D.C. (in press)
“Poaching, trade and consumption of tiger parts in the Bangladesh Sundarbans”.
In G. Potter, A. Nurse and M. Hall (eds.) The Geography of Environmental
Crime: Conservation, wildlife crime and environmental activism Palgrave:
London.
Saif S. Islam Anwarul Md. MacMillan DC.
“Who is killing tiger and why?”
Secretariat of the Convention on
Biological Diversity (2000).Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the
Convention on Biological Diversity. Text and Annexes. Montreal. Secretariat
of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
The Daily Star,. (2015).
"Gunfight" with cops- six suspected tiger poachers shot dead in
Bangladesh. Retrieved from
http://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/6-poachers-shot- dead-sundarbans-124558
Wild Life Conservation and Security Act,
ACT No XXX of 2012, Bangladesh. Ministry of
Law, Peoples Republic of Bangladesh
Wild Life Conservation and Security Act,
ACT No XXX of 2012, Bangladesh. Chapter 1, definition 37. Page 3. Ministry of
Law, Peoples Republic of Bangladesh