KASHMIR CONFLICT BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN: A REALIST PERSPECTIVE
Mohd. Shekaib Alam*,1 Muhammet Ali Guler2, Moyenul Hasan3
1 Master Candidate,
Department of Political Science, International Islamic University Malaysia
(IIUM), P.O. Box 10, 50728 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia.
2Master Candidate, Department of Political Science, International
Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), P.O. Box 10, 50728 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
3 Master Candidate, Department of Political Science, International
Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), P.O. Box 10, 50728 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
|
|
ABSTRACT |
Keywords: Kashmir;
India; Pakistan; Instrument of Accession; |
|
The dispute over
Kashmir between India and Pakistan is an international issue which arose on
the world scene in 1947, when Maharaja of Kashmir, Hari Singh signed on
instrument of accession to India on 26 October 1947. Since beginning, this
verdict was questioned by the government of Pakistan arguing majority of
state’s population was Muslim and due to this four times both countries India
and Pakistan went for war over this issue. Observing the nature of politics
by both governments, this article argued both countries are driven merely by
their national interests and have no sympathy with the people of Kashmir at
large that how they feel. To analyse above argument, article has adopted
classical realism as theory to study this subject. Publisher All rights reserved. |
Introduction
India and
Pakistan whenever aim to initiate a peaceful, mutually acceptable solution to
the Kashmir dispute, they came across a number of constant threat of
disruptions, especially recurring tensions between India and Pakistan.
Incidences such as the 2008 terror attack in Mumbai, cross-border firing
between the two armies in January and August of 2013 etc. that stop both
countries to move forward. Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, in reaction to
the death of two Indian soldiers in January 2013 said “After this barbaric act,
there cannot be business as usual (with Pakistan)”
Therefore,
the issue of Kashmir is very complex and bewildering in nature. In 2002, the
former American President, Bill Clinton described Kashmir as most dangerous
place on the surface of the earth
Realist
assume international system as anarchy where a central authority does not
exist. States are sovereign and autonomous. They are the actors whom concerns
own security and national interest. In order to be secured and obtain its
national interest, they have to struggle for power as much they can. The ideal
is to be hegemonic power
LITERATURE REVIEW
India and Pakistan’s
dispute over Kashmir is an International issue. Due to this, number of
researches and scholarly works has been produced concerning this issue but
majority of works are developed in the conflict resolution perspective. India,
Pakistan and the Kashmir Dispute by Robert G. Wirsing (1994) is one of
finest work which discusses the issue extensively with insightful analysis.
Another great work is Kashmir: A Disputed Legacy, 1984-90 (1991) written
by a British historian Alastair Lamb. He argues that Maharaja Hari Singh did
not sign the Instrument of Accession on Oct. 26, 1947 but it is a conspiracy
between Indian National Congress leaders, the Maharaja Government and senior
Indian army officers including few British. Therefore, India’s legal claim to
the state of Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) is deceitful. Similar thought is
expressed by Victoria Schofield in her book Kashmir Conflict (1996). She
argues that according to confirmed source Maharaja Hari Singh left Srinagar for
Jammu at 2am of 26th October 1947, where journey requires 16 hours.
Therefore, it is hard to believe session of Instrument of Accession has been
taken place upon his arrival in the evening of the same day.
In another
hand, Prem Shankar Jha in his book Kashmir, 1947: Rival Versions of History (1996)
deals the issue of instrument in detail and rebuttal claims of Lamb and alike.
He proved the Instrument of Accession that had actually been signed by
providing historical material and testimonies such as that of Field Marshal Sam
Manekshaw. Ayesha Jalal in her book The State of Martial Rule
(1990) argues that Kashmir dispute is a bone of contention between India
and Pakistan since independence of India and formation of Pakistan. According
to her the percentage of Pakistan Army members among the tribal raiders in 1947
was not more than 5% and due to this it is incorrect to say Pakistan actively
promoted the sentiments that had encouraged the tribesmen to invade Kashmir.
She further says keeping Kashmir dispute alive, both countries India and
Pakistan are spending endlessly on military. Her more focus in this book was on
Pakistan’s political economy. Based on Subalterns and Raj: South Asian since
1600 by Rispin Bates (2007) the Instrument of Accession was signed by
Maharaja of Kashmir but on the condition of having a referendum. Even at the
time of the ceasefire the main condition of ceasefire agreement was that a
referendum should be held to determine the fate once normality was restored. The
roots of Kashmir Problem edited by Devendra Swarup and Sushi Aggarwal gives
another perspective on the issue of Kashmir. It argues the issue of Kashmir is
exploiting major economic and military resources of the country. This issues
made Kashmiri Hindus refugees in their own homeland. According to this book,
the reason of continuity of this dispute is Kashmiri militancy. An article
which has studied the issue of Kashmir from neorealist perspective where the
focus of the writer was to explain underlying conflict between two states. It
is believed neorealist explains inter-state conflict in a good manner
Kashmir
and its Conflict in Brief
Kashmir is located in
the far north-west of the south Asian subcontinent. It enjoys strategic
location between Central Asia and South Asia and it shares border with India
and Pakistan, Afghanistan and China. The total area of Kashmir is 86023 square
miles which are divided between Pakistan which possess 32358 square meters and
India which possess 53665 square meters based on 1972 agreements where both
countries had signed. People of Kashmir are combined with different races, such
as Aryan, Mongol, Afghan, and Turks
As for the
current position of Jammu and Kashmir, it goes back to 1846, where British
ruler bought it for Ghulab Singh, a Hindu ruler from a Sikh ruler in 7.5
million rupees which is known in history by Amritsar Convention and Ghulab
Singh kingdom lasted till 1947
This is a
brief description of Kashmir and India and Pakistan relations over it. However,
the great challenge which lies in Kashmir is that there are people who want to
join with India such as secularist parties Kashmir National Conference,
headed by Farooq Abdullah, who believes Kashmir is part of India but he seeks
good and wide control over it. The another party is independence seeker such as
Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front, headed by Mr. Yasin which was
established in 1965, and rest wants to join with Pakistan. They are for example
people of Jamaat-e-Islami Kashmir, headed by Ghulam Butt, as well Conference
of Muslims in Kashmir, headed by Abdul Ghani butt and others. Therefore, it
looks very hard for Kashmiris to determine where they want to go
Significant
of kashmir
India
and Pakistan already went for four wars over Kashmir issue, and still no one
wants to leave it. This simply indicates its significance for both countries.
As for India, it is a very strategic place for its security against China and
Pakistan. It considers it as geographical extension for many natural resources
and a barrier to the philosophy of Pakistan Government which could threaten
India’s internal security
Stands
of India and Pakistan
Since both countries have immense advantages due to acquiring Kashmir.
It will be interested to know each country’s claim with regard to Kashmir. As
for Pakistan, it considers it as an unfinished agenda of the
division of India in 1947. Pakistan regards it as an
issue of giving the right of self-determination to the Kashmiris, a principle also accepted by the UN Security Council
Resolution where original importance of Kashmir for Pakistan lies in the
two-nation theory upon which All India Muslim League based its demand for a
separate Muslim homeland
Analysis
on Realist paradigm
In order to analyze
the India and Pakistan’s stands over Kashmir, the researcher have applied some
simple steps. First, he explained in introduction that the core of realist
perspective is international system is anarchy, consequently state should move
towards self-help, the guarantee of its survival is accumulating power till it
became hegemonic in international system and rulers should not be motivated by
ethical norms in diplomacy and statecraft. Therefore, firstly it will be
analyzed how India and Pakistan are accumulating power on the issue of Kashmir,
second step is researcher will observe nature of diplomacy played by both
countries. Thirdly, he will see which country is more realistic in nature.
As for
first step of comparison; India since its independence has shown its power in
order to retain many states with it as discussed above and Kashmir is one of
them. India is well aware of beauty of Kashmir that can bring tourists, that’s
why it had kept many troops there even conflict was not started
With
regard to second point, India refused to initiate talk with Pakistan because
the initiative came from Pakistan after consulting separatist leader Shabir
Khan arguing if Pakistan wants to talk with India, should come directly after
seeing what happened on 18 August 2014
With
regard to third point, seems India is stronger in practicing the realistic
hypothesis in accumulating the power due to some facts. First, according to
guidelines given by British Indian ruler to princely ruled states, Kashmir
should join Pakistan because it has many similarities such as culture,
language, and majority of population is Muslims but due to India presence of
mind and its Machiavellian trick, it was able to retain Jammu and Kashmir with
India and day by day it is making Kashmir unbroken part of India. One agenda of
current ruling government of India is to remove special status of Kashmir from
Indian constitution. So might in near future, it will be ordinary state of
India as others
Conclusion
As conclusion, researcher
like to quote his first argument that India and Pakistan are more concerned to
their interest rather they care about people of Kashmir. One reason of saying
so is what I discussed above that how both are fighting for Kashmir, just to
attain it. As for India it is estimated since 1989, 50,000 civilians are died
during the conflict. Human Rights Watch issued a report where it demonstrates
that civilians are tortured on security check points. Indian forces do rape of
women
REFERENCES
Adhikari, Suddepto, and Mukul Kamle. (2010).
"The Kashmir: An Unresolved Dispute Between India and Pakistan." Geopolitics
Quarterly 59-107.
Allison Berland,
Michael Kugelman. (2014). "Is There Any Hope for India-Pakistan
Relations?" Foreign Policy.
Art, Robert J., and
Robert Jervis. (2009). International politics: Enduring concepts and
contemporary issues. New York: Pearson Longman.
Asif, Bushra. (2006).
"How Independent is Azad Jammu and Kashmir." In Kashmir: New
voices, New approaches, by Waheguru Pal, 33-45. Colorado: Lynne Rienner
Publishers, Inc.
A'ti, Mohammad Abdul. (2004).
"Kashmir: A half century of conflict." Aljazeera.net, March
10.
Cheema, Musarat Javed.
(2015). "Pakistan – India Conflict with Special Reference to
Kashmir." Journal of South Asian Studies 45-69.
Ghosh, Deepshikha. (2014).
"PM Narendra Modi Raises Nawaz Sharif's Kashmir Comments With UN
Secretary-General." September 27.
India, Pakistan and
the Kashmir Dispute... (1994). Robert G. Wirsing. London: The Macmillan
Press LTD.
Joshi, Shashank. (2016).
"Pathankot attack: India-Pakistan peace talks derailed?" http://www.bbc.com,
January 1.
Kashmir Initiative
Group. n.d. Background to the Kashmir Conflict: Challenges and
Opportunities. Srinagar.
Kumar, Hari. (2014).
"Indian Defense Chief Blames Pakistan for Kashmir Conflict." The
New York Times, October 10.
Maududi, Abul A'la.(1986).
The issue of Muslim Kashmir. Kuwait: Da'r al-Qalam.
Mishra, Pankaj. (2010).
"Kashmir: The World’s Most Dangerous Place." New York Daily,
March 4. Accessed 3 2, 2016. http://www.nybooks.com.
Murad, Sarah Mustafa. (2009).
"The issue of Kashmir." Civilized Dialogue, Feruary 2.
Accessed 2 28, 2016.
Pal, Khagendra
Chandra. (1995). "The relations between the Indian Union and the state of
Jammu and Kashmir." In The Story of Kashmir: Yesterday and Today,
by Verinder Grover, 192 - 206. New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publications.
Party, Bhartia Janta. (2014).
Election Manifesto 2014. New Delhi: BJP Manifesto Committee.
Philosophy, Stanford
Encyclopedia of. (2013). "Political Realism in International
Relations." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Rai, Mridu. (2004). Hindu
Rulers, Muslim Subjects. London: C. Hurst & Co. Ltd.
Rajagopalan, Rajesh.(
2014). "Neorealist Theory and the India-Pakistan Conflict." Institute
for Defense Studies and Analysis.
Saraf, Om Prakash. (1995).
"Kashmir's Constitutional Status in India." In The History of
Kashmir: Yesterday and Today, by Virinder Grover, 167 - 172. New Delhi:
Deep & Deep Publications.
Sarwar, Tarik Jan
& Col Ghulam. (1990). Kashmir Problems: Challenges and Responses.
Islamabad: Institute of Policy Studies, Islamabad.
Schofield, Victoria. (2000).
Conflict in Kashmir. New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd.
Sehgal, Rashmi. (2011).
"Kashmir Conflict: Solutions and Demand for Self-determination." International
Journal of Humanities and Social Science 188 - 195.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie.
(2011). Anne-Marie Slaughter. Oxford: Wolfrum, R. (Ed.) Max Planck
Encyclopedia of Public International Law.
Suri, Kavita. (2006).
"Women in the Valley: From Victims to Agents of Change." In Kashmir:
New Voices, New Approaches, by Waheguru Pal, 81-95. Colorado: Lynee
Rienner Publishers, Inc.
Swarup, Devendra. (1992).
The Roots of Kashmir Problem. New Delhi: Siya Ram Printers.
The Carter Center. (2003).
The Kashmiri Conflict: Historical and Prospective, Intervention Analyses.
www.cartercenter.org.
The Telegraph. (2011).
"A brief history of the Kashmir conflict." www.thetelegraph.com,
September 24. Accessed 2 27, 2016.
Venkatraman, Amritha. (2008).
Understanding Islam and Terror. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller
Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG, Dudweiler Landstr.
Wirsing, Robert G. (1994).
India, Pakistan, and the Kashmir Dispute on regional conflict and its
resolutions. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.